Allfine Group-20 years experience Solution
1:Label production line- flexo print machine,die cutting machine,slitting machine,inspection and rewinding machine
2:Flexible package line-water bottle label PVC,heat transfer Pet, Opp, Pe etc rotogravure printer, dry laminator, PP PE film blowing machine,bag making machine
3:Decal paper,wine and smoking package-Silk screen press machinery, wicket dryer, uv dryer
4:Paper cup production line- flexo printer. die cutting machine, paper cup making machine
1: Save material 2: Improve efficiency 3:Professional tranning 4: Factory built
Partner Manager-Jack Huang
Allfine Group
RY320-4c Auto Label Flexo Printing Machine Automatic Flexographic Flexo Label Printing Machine (Printer Machine)
flexo printing production line.pdf
Model | Label flexo printing machine (printing speed 100m/min) | ||||
Width | 320mm | 420mm | 520mm |
Note: upgrade model will be with 2 servo motors and drives, PLC(Germany siemens), Touch screen(Taiwan Weinview), etc. The printing speed is 100m/min. |
Standard configuration 1. 1set of printing rollers 2. 1set of anilox roller 3. IR Dryer 4. One rotary die-cutting station 5. Unwinder tension controller (China brand) 6. Rewinder tension controller (China brand) 7. Web-guiding system: Simulation EPC |
Technical Data | |||
Model | 320 | 420 | 520 |
Printing speed | 100m/min | 100m/min | 100m/min |
Printing color | 4colours | 4colours | 4colours |
Max. width of paper | 350mm | 450mm | 550mm |
Max .printing width | 320mm | 420mm | 520mm |
Max. unwinding diameter | 600mm | 600mm | 600mm |
Max. rewinding diameter | 600mm | 600mm | 600mm |
Printing length | 175-355mm | 175-355mm | 175-355mm |
Precision of chromatography | ±0.1mm | ±0.1mm | ±0.1mm |
Dimensions | 2m*1.0m*2.2m | 2m*1.1m*2.2m | 2m*1.2m*2.2m |
Machine weight | About 2600kg | About 2800kg | About 3000kg |
LC-320Z automatic label die cutting machine
HD video link about LC- 350Z Medium Speed Die Cutting Machine (300 times per min, running at domestic customer's factory)
https://youtu.be/BwWWdGclTH8
During the early part of the 20th century, the technique was used extensively in food packaging in the United States. However, in the 1940s, the Food and Drug Administration classified aniline dyes as unsuitable for food packaging. Printing sales plummeted. Individual firms tried using new names for the process, such as "Lustro Printing" and "Transglo Printing", but met with limited success. Even after the Food and Drug Administration approved the aniline process in 1949 using new, safe inks, sales continued to decline as some food manufacturers still refused to consider aniline printing. Worried about the image of the industry, packaging representatives decided the process needed to be renamed.