ODM Acceptable ISO13485 Certified Lumbar Transforaminal Endoscopy Instruments Trephine

1 Introduction:
If you are looking for minimally invasive surgery medical instruments with good quality, competitive price and reliable service. Wanhe medical is manufaturing these for you. We provide general and professional laparoscopic instruments with CE, FDA approved.

2 Specifications
1 Adopt optinum stainless steel material
2 Corrosion resistant
3 Tough construction
4 Light weight and easy operation
5 Economic price and optimum quality

FAQ

Can minimally invasive orthopedic surgical instruments help improve patients’ postoperative quality of life?

Minimally invasive orthopedic surgical instruments can really help improve patients’ quality of life after surgery. Minimally invasive surgery significantly improves patients' treatment experience and postoperative quality of life by reducing surgical trauma, shortening recovery time, and reducing the risk of complications. For example, in lung cancer surgery, minimally invasive surgery only requires a few small holes. Not only is the wound smaller and more beautiful, recovery is also faster, and the patient's quality of life after surgery will be greatly improved. In the field of digestive endoscopy, super minimally invasive surgery only removes lesions and does not remove organs. The integrity and functionality of the human anatomy remain intact after surgery, and the patient's quality of life after surgery is basically unaffected. In the application of urology surgery, minimally invasive technology follows the "patient-centered" treatment concept and significantly improves patients' treatment experience and postoperative quality of life by reducing surgical trauma, shortening recovery time, and reducing the risk of complications. In minimally invasive gynecological surgery, combined with perioperative traditional Chinese medicine treatment, it can promote postoperative recovery, shorten hospitalization days, reduce patient pain, and improve quality of life. In cardiac surgery, minimally invasive cardiac surgery performs cardiac surgery through small incisions, reducing the trauma and recovery time of traditional surgery. Patients have less postoperative pain, faster recovery periods, and significantly improved quality of life. Therefore, minimally invasive orthopedic surgical instruments have a positive effect on improving patients' postoperative quality of life.

What is the specific effectiveness of minimally invasive orthopedic surgical instruments in reducing complications?

Minimally invasive orthopedic surgical instruments have significant results in reducing complications. Specifically, minimally invasive surgery reduces the incidence of complications such as adhesions and stiffness by reducing large incisions in the body cavity. In addition, the application of three-dimensional image navigation technology further reduces complications. Minimally invasive technology not only emphasizes small incisions, but also uses precise positioning technology to reduce trauma to surrounding tissues and interference with the patient's physiological functions, thereby reducing perioperative complications.

For example, in the treatment of calcaneal fractures, minimally invasive techniques have gradually become a clinical development trend. These new methods reduce the incidence of complications and maintain considerable therapeutic effects. Similarly, in the treatment of midshaft clavicle fractures, minimally invasive plate internal fixation (MIPO) technology has shorter operation time and lower complication rate than traditional open surgery.

In addition, hip optimization surgery improves cosmetic results by reducing pain, blood loss, and wound healing issues through soft tissue and specially modified techniques. The application of minimally invasive ultrasonic osteotome in robot-assisted sacral tumor resection also reduces the complications of laparotomy and posterior surgery. Arthroscopic minimally invasive surgery significantly reduces the risk of postoperative complications such as infection, bleeding, and nerve damage when treating joint diseases.

What is the difference in recovery time between minimally invasive surgery and traditional surgery?

There is a significant difference in recovery time between minimally invasive surgery and traditional surgery. According to several lines of evidence, minimally invasive surgery typically has shorter recovery times than traditional surgery.

For simple minimally invasive surgeries, such as inguinal hernia, appendectomy, or cholecystectomy, recovery time after surgery is generally 5-7 days. Traditional laparotomy surgery takes longer to recover, usually 2 weeks or more.

More complex minimally invasive surgeries, such as colorectal tumors or laparoscopic liver surgeries, also have a relatively short recovery time, with full recovery generally occurring within 3-5 days. In contrast, traditional surgery requires relatively long postoperative pain and recovery time due to larger incisions.

Wound healing time for minimally invasive chest surgery is approximately one week, but full recovery and ability to live independently may take 1-2 months. This suggests that recovery times from certain complex minimally invasive surgeries are still longer.

Specific to certain types of minimally invasive surgery, such as minimally invasive surgery for lumbar disc herniation, it takes 1-2 months to return to normal range. The recovery time for minimally invasive appendicitis surgery is usually 1-2 weeks.

The advantages of minimally invasive surgery include less trauma and faster recovery. A surgery that originally required 1-2 weeks of recovery can be recovered within 3-7 days through minimally invasive surgery.

What research supports the specific impact of minimally invasive cardiac surgery on patients’ quality of life?

There are multiple studies supporting the specific impact of minimally invasive cardiac surgery on patients’ quality of life. The following is a detailed analysis:

Postoperative recovery effects: Multiple studies have shown that minimally invasive cardiac surgery can significantly improve patients’ quality of life. For example, one study pointed out that the quality of life factor scores after minimally invasive cardiac surgery are higher than those after thoracotomy, and the postoperative hospitalization time, intraoperative blood loss and other indicators are better than those after traditional thoracotomy.

Reduced trauma and complications: Minimally invasive cardiac surgery has the characteristics of small incisions, less bleeding, less pain, less trauma, and faster recovery, which directly improve the patient's quality of life after surgery. In addition, certain types of aortic arch aneurysms can also be treated through minimally invasive/hybrid surgery, further reducing surgical trauma and related complications.

Improved mental and physical health: Although most patients experience an overall improvement in their quality of life after surgery, there are still some patients who do not experience significant improvement in their mental health. This suggests that preoperative functional status has an important impact on postoperative quality of life, and therefore preoperative assessment and preparation are necessary.

Application of enhanced recovery protocols: The use of accelerated recovery after surgery (ERAS) protocols can further improve the recovery outcomes of patients after minimally invasive cardiac surgery. For example, in ultra-fast track minimally invasive valve surgery (UFT-MIVS), normothermic cardiopulmonary bypass management and other measures resulted in significantly better patient outcomes within 30 days than conventional minimally invasive valve surgery (C-MIVS).

Comparison of clinical effects: Comparing the clinical effects of thoracotomy and minimally invasive cardiac surgery, it was found that the hospitalization time and complication rate of the minimally invasive group were lower than those of the thoracotomy group, which shows that minimally invasive surgery has obvious advantages in optimizing patient recovery effects. .

Based on the data, it can be concluded that minimally invasive cardiac surgery significantly improves patients' quality of life by reducing trauma, reducing complications, shortening hospital stays, and applying accelerated recovery protocols.

In minimally invasive gynecological surgery, how does traditional Chinese medicine treatment promote postoperative recovery and improve quality of life?
In minimally invasive gynecological surgery, traditional Chinese medicine treatment promotes postoperative recovery and improves quality of life in a variety of ways. First of all, traditional Chinese medicine emphasizes overall balance and self-regulation, believing that diseases are often caused by an imbalance of yin and yang in the body or poor qi and blood. Therefore, during post-operative recovery, Chinese medicine focuses on promoting the circulation of qi and blood in the body, accelerating wound healing, and reducing post-operative discomfort.

Combining perioperative TCM treatment can shorten hospitalization time, reduce patient pain, improve quality of life, and give full play to the advantages of integrated TCM and Western medicine in the treatment of gynecological diseases. For example, traditional Chinese medicine fumigation treatment can improve the blood circulation system of the whole body through the fumigation, warming and transpiration effect of the medicine, thereby promoting postoperative recovery.

In addition, traditional Chinese medicine also has a significant effect on the recovery of gastrointestinal function after gynecological surgery. Traditional Chinese medicine promotes the recovery of gastrointestinal function through acupuncture and other treatment methods, which is of great significance for improving the patient's general condition after surgery. Traditional Chinese medicine acupoint application care also shows good results, and can effectively promote the recovery of gastrointestinal function after obstetrics and gynecology surgery.

What are the technological advances in minimally invasive surgical instruments in reducing patients’ postoperative pain?

Minimally invasive surgical instruments have made significant technical progress in reducing patients' postoperative pain, which is mainly reflected in the following aspects:

Small incisions and less trauma: Minimally invasive surgery usually uses smaller incisions, which greatly reduces damage to surrounding tissue. For example, in cervical foraminal decompression surgery, a minimally invasive posterior approach can effectively reduce intraoperative bleeding and damage to surrounding soft tissues, thereby reducing postoperative pain. Similarly, in the field of dentistry, minimally invasive tooth extraction is performed through tiny incisions and high-precision instruments, which significantly reduces damage to soft tissues, allowing patients to feel almost no pain, and postoperative pain and swelling are also significantly reduced.

Nerve protection: Some minimally invasive surgical techniques focus specifically on protecting vital nerves to reduce postoperative pain. For example, single-port VATS lobectomy reduces postoperative pain by reducing nerve damage. In addition, direct anterior approach total hip replacement surgery also reduces postoperative pain by reducing damage to nerves and soft tissues.

Enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS): A combination of enhanced recovery after surgery and minimally invasive surgery that can effectively relieve pain and promote rapid recovery. For example, the orthopedic team of Shanghai Hongkou District Jiangwan Hospital used spinal endoscopic minimally invasive surgery and the ERAS program to enable patients with lumbar disc herniation to stand and walk easily 2 days after surgery and be discharged from the hospital smoothly.

Robot-assisted surgery: Minimally invasive abdominal surgery robots not only have the advantages of traditional minimally invasive surgery, such as small incisions, light pain, less bleeding, and fast postoperative recovery, but also solve many problems existing in traditional surgeries. The surgical method based on master-slave control can reduce the fatigue of doctors during surgery and further reduce the postoperative pain of patients.

Comprehensive technology application: The development of modern minimally invasive surgical instruments also includes intelligence and information digitization. The application of these technologies makes surgery more precise and safer, thereby reducing postoperative pain. For example, China's independently developed minimally invasive surgical robots mark the country's gradual mastery of relevant technologies and its move away from dependence on foreign technologies.

In short, the technological progress of minimally invasive surgical instruments in reducing patients' postoperative pain is mainly reflected in small incisions, less trauma, nerve protection, accelerated recovery, and robot-assisted surgery.

For more photos and details please contact me:
Company Name: Tonglu Wanhe Medical Instruments Co., Ltd.
Sales: Emma
Tel:+86 571 6991 5082
Mobile: +86 13685785706