Customized Request Medical Equipment Urology Endoscope Lithotriptoscopy Set HA4002

1 Introduction:
If you are looking for minimally invasive surgery medical instruments with good quality, competitive price and reliable service. Wanhe medcal is manufaturing these for you. We provide general and professional laparoscopic instruments with CE, FDA approved.

2 Specifications
1 Adopt optinum stainless steel material
2 Adopt German fiber optical
3 Corrosion resistant
4 Tough construct
5 Superb workmanship
6 Compatible with Vanhur, Olypus, Storz, Wolf, Acmi Stryker light guide cable

3 The Lithotriptoscopy Set For Your Reference

FAQ

How to choose high-quality urological surgical instruments?

Choosing high-quality urological surgical instruments requires comprehensive consideration of multiple factors, including instrument quality, operational flexibility, versatility, safety, and compliance with relevant standards and specifications. The following are detailed steps and suggestions:

Choosing medical devices from well-known brands can ensure product quality and reliability. For example, Wanhe medcal and others are recognized as high-quality brands in the industry. In addition, all clinical equipment should obtain relevant certificates issued by the State Food and Drug Administration.

Urological surgery involves a variety of different instruments, such as guidewires, bladder laser resectoscopes, morcellator lens kits, and ultrasonic scalpel systems. Each instrument has its own specific functions and specifications. For example, bladder laser resectoscopes must be equipped with F26 outer sheaths, inner sheaths, and 30° lenses; while ultrasonic scalpel systems require technical requirements such as wireless design functions, manual switches, and a variety of styles of blades.

The choice of instruments should be determined based on the operator's experience and the patient's specific situation. For example, in urolithiasis surgery, the choice of instruments should depend on the need for surgical stone removal, the anatomy of the collecting system, and the size and texture distribution of stones.

High-quality urological surgical instruments must have high safety and reliability. For example, Wanhe medcal urological surgical guidewires are flexible, multifunctional and highly safe, and are important auxiliary tools for doctors to perform surgery. In addition, the PDCA management model should be used to manage instruments and equipment to standardize the use process, reduce the number of failures, and extend the service life of the instrument.

Reference should be made to relevant standards such as the General Requirements and Test Methods for Non-cutting Articulated Instruments for Surgical Instruments, which cover the standard specifications of all non-cutting articulated instruments. This helps ensure that the selected instruments meet industry best practices and safety requirements.

It is also crucial to conduct a comprehensive assessment and preparation before surgery. This includes a comprehensive assessment and preparation of the patient to ensure the success of the operation and reduce the occurrence of postoperative complications.

Through the above steps and suggestions, high-quality urological surgical instruments can be effectively selected, thereby improving surgical efficiency, reducing risks, and ultimately improving patient treatment outcomes.

Which international and domestic standards are most critical for urological surgical instruments?

In the field of urological surgical instruments, the formulation of international and domestic standards is crucial to ensure the safety, effectiveness and consistency of instruments. Here are some key standards:

This is a standard published by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) on general requirements and specifications for medical devices, which specifies the dimensions and characteristics of various types of nails used in surgical procedures.

This is a Chinese national standard that covers general requirements and test methods for non-cutting articulated instruments (such as hemostats, needle holders, retractors, etc.), applicable to various clinical disciplines and surgical procedures.

These standards involve requirements and test methods for instrument hardness to ensure that surgical instruments meet specific physical performance requirements.

Surgical instruments must meet these certifications and standards to ensure their quality and safety.

This is a quality management system standard that guides quality control and management during the manufacturing process.

ASTM International has developed multiple standards related to medical and surgical devices, covering multiple fields such as cardiology, neurology, audiology, gastroenterology and plastic surgery, and works closely with regulatory agencies such as the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

How to evaluate the safety and reliability of urological surgical instruments?

Evaluating the safety and reliability of urological surgical instruments requires comprehensive consideration of multiple aspects, including risk management, quality control, cleaning and disinfection management, etc. The following is a detailed evaluation method:

Risk management is an important means to ensure the safety and effectiveness of medical devices. The safety and reliability of surgical instruments can be significantly improved by systematically identifying, analyzing and controlling potential risks. For example, testing and analyzing surgical instruments that are subject to risk management can identify and solve existing problems, thereby formulating corresponding risk management measures. In addition, a sound risk management system should be established within the hospital to ensure that all surgical instruments used are subject to strict risk assessment and management.

Quality control is a key link in ensuring the safety and reliability of surgical instruments. By standardizing the behavior of operators and ensuring that each surgical instrument is strictly inspected and tested before use, the incidence of hospital infections can be effectively reduced. In addition, hospitals are required to thoroughly clean and sterilize all reusable instruments, which is the basis for ensuring disinfection and sterilization.

According to international standards such as ISO 14971, risk analysis and risk assessment of medical devices require various complex reliability and safety analysis work. These standards specify the dimensions to be considered, the standards and technical methods to be used. By following these standards, the safety and reliability of surgical instruments can be systematically evaluated.

The full life cycle management of surgical instruments is also an important part of evaluating their safety and reliability. This includes management and monitoring throughout the entire process from design, manufacturing to final scrapping. Surgical instrument management innovation based on UDI (Unique Device Identification) can help hospitals better track and manage the use of surgical instruments, thereby improving their safety and reliability.

Hospitals should develop clear surgical quality management systems, provide guidelines, ensure the safety and effectiveness of surgical procedures, and reduce the possibility of surgical-related risks and adverse events. For example, the standards for each stage of surgical procedures mentioned in the "Notice of the Chinese Hospital Association on the Release and Implementation of the <Surgical Safety Checklist and Surgical Risk Assessment Form>" can help reduce surgical errors and improve patient safety.

Which specific function instruments are the most popular and effective in urological surgery?

In urological surgery, specific function instruments are widely popular and used because of their efficiency and precision. The following are some of the most popular and effective instruments:

The da Vinci robotic surgical system is known for its fine operation capabilities in a small space and integrates intraoperative ultrasound technology to accurately determine the location of the tumor. The surgical instruments at its end have multiple functions such as traction, cutting, and suturing, which can completely remove the tumor and perform fine suturing. In addition, robot-assisted single-port laparoscopic surgery (R-LESS) has also been widely used, especially for complex surgeries such as radical prostatectomy.

High-frequency electrosurgical unit has significant advantages in urological surgery, including fast cutting speed, good hemostasis and high safety. It can be used under laparoscope, without frequent instrument replacement, and output conversion can be achieved by stepping on the conversion switch, saving time and facilitating operation.

Laparoscopic technology combines modern technology with traditional surgical techniques. It not only achieves the same therapeutic effect as traditional open surgery, but also has the advantages of less trauma, less bleeding, faster recovery and shorter hospitalization time. In recent years, with the advancement of medical technology, single-port laparoscopic surgery (LESS) has also been continuously promoted, further reducing the number and length of surgical incisions, alleviating patient pain, and shortening the postoperative recovery period.

In recent years, the miniaturization of ureteroscopes and PCNL equipment, the promotion and application of high-power holmium lasers, thulium lasers and disposable ureteroscopes have made significant progress in the surgical treatment of urolithiasis. These devices excel in handling complex urinary stones, providing safer and more effective solutions.

When choosing urological surgical instruments, how to balance the need for multifunctionality and single-function devices?

When choosing urological surgical instruments, balancing the need for multifunctionality and single-function devices is a complex issue that requires comprehensive consideration. Here are a few key points:

Multifunctional devices usually have more functions and higher technical requirements. For example, single-port laparoscopic surgery (LESS) is a more complex surgical method. Although its safety is comparable to traditional open surgery, it requires higher technical requirements for doctors. Therefore, when choosing multifunctional devices, it is necessary to ensure that the doctor has the corresponding skills and experience.

Different patients may require different surgical methods and instruments due to different conditions and physical conditions. For example, the robot-assisted single-port laparoscopic surgical system can choose different systems for surgery according to the specific conditions of the patient to achieve the best results. Therefore, when choosing multifunctional devices, individual considerations should be made based on the specific case.

Minimally invasive surgery is becoming more and more important. Many urological surgical procedures can already be performed with improved single-port laparoscopy, and this trend is still expanding
. Therefore, when choosing multifunctional equipment, you can give priority to those instruments that can support minimally invasive surgery, while retaining some traditional single-function instruments to deal with complex situations.

Multifunctional equipment is often more expensive and requires more maintenance and training resources. Therefore, it is necessary to weigh economic benefits and actual needs when choosing. For some common, standardized surgeries, it may be more economical and practical to use single-function instruments.

With the development of technology, new single-port laparoscopic surgical instruments will continue to be launched. These new devices will reduce the difficulty of surgery and enhance operability. Therefore, when choosing multifunctional equipment, you can consider products with innovation potential and future application prospects.

How is the PDCA management model for urological surgical instruments implemented?

For the PDCA management model for urological surgical instruments, the specific implementation process can be divided into the following steps:

Plan:

Determine goals and policies: First, clarify management goals, such as improving the intactness rate of surgical instruments, reducing the number of repairs, and improving the knowledge of medical staff on instruments.

Develop activity plans: Develop detailed implementation plans based on goals, including required resources, personnel arrangements, timetables, etc.
Execution (Do):

Implement management measures: Operate according to the plan, such as strengthening equipment management training, clarifying the equipment management responsibilities of each department, and ensuring that the person in charge of the using department bears the primary responsibility.
Standardize the operation process: Standardize the handover operation of urological surgical instruments in the operating room and supply room to avoid the occurrence of non-standard operations.
Check (Check):

Evaluate the effect: Check the changes before and after implementation through data comparison and analysis. For example, compare the intact rate of instruments, the number of repairs, and the assessment scores of medical staff on instrument knowledge before and after PDCA management.
Find problems: Analyze the current situation, find out the existing problems, and use data to illustrate the main problems that need to be improved.
Action (Act):

Summarize experience: Summarize successful experiences and lessons from failures, standardize successful experiences and promote them to other fields.
Continuous improvement: Take corresponding corrective measures for the problems found, continuously optimize the management process, and improve the overall management level.

For more photos and details please contact me:
Company Name: Tonglu Wanhe Medical Instruments Co., Ltd.
Sales: Sue