Specifications
Model NO. :
HA1106.3
Medical Device Regulatory Type :
Type 1
OEM :
Acceptable
ODM :
Acceptable
Transport Package :
Standard Export Packing
Specification :
Without valve
Trademark :
Vanhur
Origin :
Tonglu, Zhejiang, China
HS Code :
9018909919
Supply Ability :
200 PCS/Month
Type :
Endoscope Accessories
Application :
Urology
Material :
Steel
Feature :
Reusable
Certification :
CE, FDA, ISO13485
Group :
Adult
Customization :
Available | Customized Request
Description

Urology Endoscope Accessories Cystoscopy Bridge Without Valve with OEM Acceptable

1 Introduction:
If you are looking for minimally invasive surgery medical instruments with good quality, competitive price and reliable service. Wanhe medical is manufaturing these for you. We provide general and professional laparoscopic instruments with CE, FDA approved.

2 Specifications
Adopt optinum stainless steel material
Corrosion resistant
Tough construct
Superb workmanship

3 Various Type For Your Reference

Model Name Specifications
HA1106.1 Endoscope bridge single channel
HA1106.2 Endoscope bridge double channel
HA1106.3 Endoscope bridge without valve
HA1204 Endoscope bridge
(For pediatric/children urethro-cystoscope)
without valve

4 Packing & Shipping:
Package detail: Poly bag and special shockproof paper box.
Delivery detail: By air

FAQ


What is the surgical effect and patient recovery of urological surgical instruments?

Surgical outcomes and patient recovery with urological surgical instruments are generally positive, with the application of minimally invasive surgical techniques in particular leading to significant improvements. The following is a detailed analysis based on the data:

Surgery results:

Minimally invasive surgery such as transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) has the advantages of efficient tissue removal and low bleeding. It can accurately and completely remove prostatic hyperplasia tissue, and can effectively treat even very large prostates.
Da Vinci robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery combines the advantages of traditional open surgery and laparoscopic surgery, and solves the problems of deep prostate surgery, small operating space, and large bleeding volume.
Laparoscopic technology combines modern technology with traditional surgical techniques to achieve the same therapeutic effect as traditional open surgery, while also having the characteristics of less trauma, less bleeding, and faster recovery.
Hall laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) is recommended by American and European guidelines as a minimally invasive treatment for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Its efficacy is equal to or better than other methods and has fewer side effects.
Patient recovery status:

Minimally invasive surgery allows patients to have smaller incisions, smaller traumatic stress reactions, reduced postoperative pain, earlier ambulation, faster recovery of organ function, and reduced hospitalization time.
During the postoperative recovery process, the patient's psychological state will also gradually improve. Factors that affect the operation include the success of the operation, the degree of postoperative pain, and the occurrence of complications.
Bundle management has a positive impact on gastrointestinal function recovery and lower limb venous thrombosis in patients undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery.
In some cases, patients recover far beyond expectations after surgery, such as being able to perform movements with high mobility.
However, while minimally invasive surgery brings many advantages, there are also some potential complications and challenges. For example, laser surgery may affect the patient's function, and elderly and high-risk patients cannot tolerate anesthesia, which may become contraindications for surgery. In addition, special complications may arise during the establishment of pneumoperitoneum.

The use of urological surgical instruments plays an important role in improving surgical results and promoting rapid patient recovery, especially in the application of minimally invasive surgical techniques. However, it is still necessary to be aware of potential risks and complications during surgery to ensure optimal treatment outcomes.


What are the latest advances in minimally invasive surgical techniques in the treatment of prostatic hyperplasia?


According to the results, recent advances in minimally invasive surgical techniques in the treatment of prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) include a variety of emerging technologies and methods. Here are some key points:

Ion bipolar and laser surgery: The use of ion bipolar and laser surgery in the treatment of BPH is mentioned, indicating that these technologies are one of the current advances.

Robot-assisted high-energy water dissection (IGRWA), prostatic segmental urethral suspension (PUL), and prostatic artery embolization (PAE): these emerging minimally invasive treatment technologies are introduced in detail, and they are challenging traditional surgical methods such as transurethral surgery Resection of the prostate (TURP) because they may have a lower risk of complications.

Rezūm hot steam ablation: A latest minimally invasive surgical technique, Rezūm hot steam ablation, is reported. It is characterized by small trauma, less bleeding, and short operation time. It retains the intact original urethral structure and reduces damage to the urethral mucosa. Minimize.

Prostate thermal vapor ablation: A variety of minimally invasive surgical methods are summarized, including transurethral resection of the prostate, transurethral prostate laser surgery, prostate thermal vapor ablation, etc., which shows that thermal vapor ablation is one of the developments in recent years.

Optilume BPH treatment: A minimally invasive treatment technology called Optilume BPH was mentioned. Although its specific operation was not described in detail, it was listed as a new medical development, implying its potential value in the treatment of BPH.

The latest advances in minimally invasive surgical technology in the treatment of prostatic hyperplasia include ion bipolar and laser surgery, robot-assisted high-energy hydrodissection, prostatic segmental urethral suspension, prostatic artery embolization, Rezūm thermal vapor ablation, and Optilume BPH treatment.


What are the long-term effects and patient satisfaction of da Vinci robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery?


Long-term outcomes and patient satisfaction with da Vinci robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery are generally positive. We can analyze this conclusion from many aspects:

Postoperative recovery:

In the field of obstetrics and gynecology, da Vinci robotic laparoscopic surgery is not only shorter in time and has minimal intraoperative bleeding, but also allows patients to recover well after surgery.
The field of urology has also shown that da Vinci robotic surgery allows patients to recover faster, experience less pain, and have better prognosis.
Reduce complications and hospital stay:

Da Vinci robotic surgery can reduce intraoperative bleeding, postoperative complications, and shorten hospital stay, thereby providing patients with a safe, comfortable, and satisfying minimally invasive surgical experience.
Surgical outcomes are significantly improved, with significantly fewer postoperative complications, injuries, and blood loss, faster recovery, and shorter hospital stays.
Patient satisfaction:

Multiple sources note that patient satisfaction following da Vinci robotic surgery is extremely high. For example, in surgeries in the fields of urology and gynecology, patients are very satisfied with the results.
In the long term, although some studies indicate that da Vinci robotic surgery is as effective as conventional surgery, its advantages include reduced blood loss and pain and improved quality of life.
Global implementation status:

As of the end of 2020, the da Vinci surgical robot has completed more than 1.2 million minimally invasive surgeries around the world, demonstrating its wide application and recognition.
Based on the above information, it can be concluded that da Vinci robot-assisted minimally invasive surgery has excellent long-term effects, mainly reflected in fast postoperative recovery, fewer complications, and short hospitalization time.

What are the specific advantages and disadvantages of laparoscopic technique compared with traditional open surgery during the recovery period?
Laparoscopic technology has the following specific advantages and disadvantages during the recovery period compared with traditional open surgery:

Advantages
Laparoscopic surgery can be completed by making several small holes in the abdominal wall, which greatly reduces surgical trauma. This means less postoperative pain, faster recovery times, and patients can return to their normal lives more quickly.

The incision of laparoscopic surgery is only 0.5 to 1 cm, and the postoperative scar is small and beautiful, meeting the cosmetic requirements.

Laparoscopic surgery causes less interference in the abdominal cavity, avoids irritation and contamination of the abdominal cavity by dust and bacteria in the air, and reduces the chance of postoperative intestinal adhesions.

Laparoscopic surgery provides a clearer surgical view, allowing doctors to operate more accurately and reducing the risk of accidentally injuring important nerves and blood vessels.

Laparoscopic surgery has less trauma, less postoperative pain, and less impact on lung function, so there are fewer postoperative complications.

Disadvantages
Laparoscopic surgery uses instruments to feel the tumor site, which is not as sensitive and intuitive as direct contact with hands, and the positioning of the tumor is not as accurate as laparotomy. If the location of polyps and tumors cannot be determined due to laparoscopic surgical instruments, it may be necessary to use other methods such as colonoscopy to accurately locate the polyps and tumors before performing surgery.

For some advanced tumors such as rectal cancer, laparoscopic surgery may not be able to completely replace traditional open surgery due to limitations of its instruments and operating methods.


What are the research reports on the impact of laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) on function?


There are several research reports and analyzes on the impact of laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) on function:

A study explored the effect of preserving the proximal urethral mucosal tissue of the spermatome during transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) on patients' postoperative erectile function. Results showed that this retention method helped improve patients' erectile function.

Another study analyzed the effects of modified urethral mucosa-preserving transurethral holmium laser enucleation of prostate (HoLEP) in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia on urinary incontinence and function. The results showed that the improved surgical method not only reduced the incidence of urinary incontinence, but also had a certain protective effect on function.

Studies have found that transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) using a bladder-neck-preserving en bloc approach has a positive impact on postoperative function recovery in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). This method is particularly suitable for relatively young patients and can effectively preserve their function.

Another study discussed the impact of holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) on postoperative ejaculation function and ejaculation satisfaction in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia. Through questionnaire survey, 225 patients who received HoLEP were followed up, and it was found that most patients' ejaculation function and ejaculation satisfaction had improved.

Overall, multiple studies have shown that transurethral holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) can significantly reduce the incidence of urinary incontinence while preserving part of the urethral mucosa, and improve function indicators such as erectile function and ejaculation function. Has a positive restorative effect.


What is the complication rate for minimally invasive urological surgery in elderly, high-risk patients?


The following data can be used to refer to the incidence of complications in minimally invasive urological surgeries for elderly and high-risk patients:

In a study at Peking University First Hospital, 239 elderly patients over 75 years old underwent radical cystectomy, of which 74 (31.0%) experienced perioperative complications.
Another study showed that an 86-year-old man successfully treated multiple kidney stones with minimally invasive surgery, but did not provide a specific complication rate.
Another study showed that the perioperative complication rate of laparoscopic radical resection of prostate cancer in elderly patients was 33.6%.



For more photos and details please contact me:
Company Name: Tonglu Wanhe Medical Instruments Co., Ltd.
Sales: Emma
Tel:+86 571 6991 5082
Mobile: +86 13685785706

Send your message to this supplier
Send Now

Urology Endoscope Accessories Cystoscopy Bridge Without Valve with OEM Acceptable

Ask Latest Price
Model NO. :
HA1106.3
Medical Device Regulatory Type :
Type 1
OEM :
Acceptable
ODM :
Acceptable
Transport Package :
Standard Export Packing
Specification :
Without valve
Contact Supplier
Urology Endoscope Accessories Cystoscopy Bridge Without Valve with OEM Acceptable

Tonglu Wanhe Medical Instrument Co., Ltd.

Verified Supplier
2 Years
zhejiang, hangzhou
Since 2010
Business Type :
Manufacturer
Total Annual :
5,000,000-10,000,000
Employee Number :
50~100
Certification Level :
Verified Supplier
Contact Supplier
Submit Requirement